Opposition Councillors and MP call for Leader to resign.

  • thehaveringdaily.co.uk

At a special meeting held yesterday by members of the Preserve group, it was revealed that the Department of Transport has so far never approved plans for a station at Beam Park.

The Dagenham and Rainham MP Jon Cruddas, recently revealed that the proposed Beam Park station was now not going ahead, which has left property developers furious as they are advertising the selling of the new builds under the guise of a planned station.

The Preserve group that focuses on over development in Havering, yesterday met to discuss the latest developments in the Beam Park station drama. The meeting was chaired by South Hornchurch Councillor Graham Williamson alongside, Jon Cruddas MP, Head of Havering Labour Councillor Keith Darvill, and Head of the opposition party Residents Association Councillor Ray Morgon.

Mr Cruddas stated from the letter he has received from the Department of Transport by the Minister who is dealing with Beam Park, that it was not a case that the funding for the station was withdrawn, it was a case of the funding was never given in the first place.

The letter states:

“There appears to be a misunderstanding at the Greater London Authority about the Department’s position regarding Beam Park Station.

We were aware through published strategy and planning documents of the proposals for a new local authority promoted station at Beam Park but had not been asked to participate in formal discussions prior to December 2017,when the GLA sought a meeting with us.

We gave advice and guidance at this meeting as to how to progress with the business case, that was already signalled then as being “very poor”, whilst highlighting the need to involve the Department of Transport as a key stakeholder going forward.

I would therefore take this opportunity to emphasise it is not that the Department withdrew support or funding for the development of the station,but that support was never given in the first instance.”

Councillor Keith Darvill stated that this would now have serious consequences for the borough and that without the correct infrastructure in place, residents would suffer and businesses would unlikely be attracted in coming to the area now that the station plans have been shelved.

Councillor Williamson added that with the 188 properties already built, the repercussions across the area would be vast and extremely damaging for Havering.

The proposals for Beam Park station began back in 2009 when talks first began with Network Rail. It is believed that the plans had passed three initial stages of approval, despite no backing from the Department for Transport.

“We’ve all been misled, we expect to be told the truth, yet we have never seen any report to show the infrastructure risk failure,” said Councillor Williamson.

Mr Cruddas added:

“The London Borough of Havering were the prime movers in this, then the GLA. This has huge implications, what confidence can the private sector have in Havering?”

Opposition Leader Councillor Ray Morgon said that the council had to take responsibility in this and that the current council lack scrutiny and are very secretive.

Councillor Morgon also went on to say that a review of our current housing target needs to be addressed urgently with realsiitic targets put into place.

Councillor Williamson then went on to say that he is now calling for the leader of the council to resign following this ongoing failure and the huge disappointments it is causing for Havering.

All the councillors and MP’s backed the call for the leader of the Council to now resign.

In response Havering’s Council Leader, Councillor Damian White told the Havering Daily:

“Any suggestion that I, or the council are to blame for the Department for Transport’s decision to not agree to a Beam Park station, is disingenuous and playing politics. Rather than working with us, the Preserve group have quite clearly decided to go for votes. We have never lied or made false promises. It is absolutely our expectation that there will be a new station at Beam Park, and we feel just as let down by this decision as everybody else.

“This is GLA land and they have the funding for the new station and are therefore leading on the station project and the area is designated for regeneration. It is also included in the London Plan. In fact, the original Beam Park development application was turned down by the Council on height and was called in and agreed by the Mayor of London.

“However, we have already met with the Dft, GLA and other Government departments and work is being done to find a solution as this station is important to unlock further investment in the area. It is clear in the letter to Jon Cruddas from the Department of Transport that they have not aimed blame at the council. The Preserve group would rather mislead the public and throw stones than work with us to fix the issue. I feel it is for them to explain their actions especially as they have been privy to decisions until now.”

2 thoughts on “Opposition Councillors and MP call for Leader to resign.

  • 23rd October 2021 at 8:39 am

    The Government have refused to give its’ approval for the station, not because of funding issues, but rather because placing a station so close to Rainham and Dagenham Dock stations they regard as not ‘value for money’ and wasteful and costly. They suggest the existing stations be upgraded instead. The problem is that development along the ‘Beam Park’ stretch of New Road has already taken/taking place but that was only approved (with its high density etc) on the basis that there was definately going to be a station! The blame for this seems to lie with the Council and the GLA. Both bodies were responsible for ensuring it would happen, Havering signed up to the GLA’s Housing Zone scheme and even agreed to fund the station (on a GLA loan). Subsequently, both moved forward on the basis it would happen but failed to ensure it would be approved thus putting all developments (and buyers monies) at risk. The Dept for Transport say they never approved it and indeed advised that the early Business Plan was not sufficent nor convincing. What a debacler! PRESERVE GROUP

  • 25th October 2021 at 9:36 am

    It appears the Council (Con) and GLA (Lab) knowingly waived the station as a carrot to attract development without getting agreement from Department of Transport to build the station. Its clearly misrepresentation and a swindle for those who invested in the area on the promise of a station.

    For me this shows the harmful impact of impossible housing targets. The government is imposing housing targets and local councils seek to comply, often ignoring local residents, but promising to mitigate the impact with new infrastructure. Except the targets preclude infrastructure and so planners dutifully seek to meet the targets with overdevelopment knowing the schemes are unviable.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: