More Protests, More Stress On A Met Workforce Struggling With Its Morale.

By Chris Hobbs – Retired Metropolitan Police Officer and now police commentator
When I’m out and about at public order events, one of the questions I’m asked by officers follows the theme as to whether I’d like to be ‘in the job today.’ My answer, I’m afraid is an emphatic no and one of several reasons would revolve around the demands placed on front line officers in terms of their frequent public order abstractions for ‘aid.’
I’m unsure whether the current rumour; namely that the number of public order trained Level 2 officers in the Met has reduced from 5,000 to just over 2,000, is true and even if this is emphatically denied by the Met, the fact that it is circulating at all should be a cause for concern. The situation will be exacerbated by the suggestion emanating from police chiefs that overtime paid to police officers be cut in order to save money. This is already provoking outrage amongst the police community on social media.
Of course there are many other reasons other than public order, for unrest and discontent within the Met’s front line but on Saturday officers had again to deal with a potentially challenging day of events which took officers away from their local areas leaving colleagues to carry the load.
Juggling competing protests.

Saturday saw Met having again to ‘juggle’ competing protests in order to ensure that those with opposing views did not come into conflict. The biggest protest was the ‘Stop the War’ march and rally linked primarily to the USA’s attack on Iran; the event still, however, featured issues surrounding Palestine with Israel appearing prominently on posters and placards.
The first question that inevitably posed itself involved the level of support that would be shown for the Iranian regime; that question was soon answered by the initial appearance of a few distinctive Iranian ‘regime’ flags that soon became a profusion. Placards featuring the now deceased Ayatollah Khamenei’s image also began to appear as the crowds grew. There was also a small Kurdish presence based on a community centre but there was no visible Kurdish flag. The various Kurdish organisations are, of course, opposed to current Iranian government, but this small group didn’t attract any animosity.
The march from Millbank to the US Embassy, would, I was told, inevitably attract the attention of pro-Israeli, pro-USA supporters and so it proved. At the junction with Lambeth Bridge a lone individual trying to unfurl an Israeli flag was engaged in debate with a well- known and popular Met liaison officer.
Further on, on a raised path overlooking the Thames running parallel to the road, familiar pro-Israeli faces could be seen which included two ‘inserts;’ those who, in the past, deliberately placed themselves in the midst of Palestine protests hoping to provoke a reaction.
On this occasion, the inserts and their fellow counter-protesters kept themselves apart from their rivals by remaining on the raised path. This also had the benefit of a steel fence that ensured their relative safety from those hurling insults and their response was to hurl jeering insults in return.

Despite the animosity, no-one was assaulted and the march proceeded to Nine Elms where the US Embassy is situated in a location chosen for its ability to be secure. Officers were clearly visible at potential points of access and further along, past a Waitrose, a temporary stage had been erected. Such was the density the crowd, many couldn’t get within viewing distance of the stage; however, there were other attractions including drum and chant ‘fests.’
The Minab School tragedy.
There was one section of the road which attracted considerable attention; it had been set up as a form of tribute shrine to the young Iranian victims of the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab. Around 165 girls between the ages of 7 and 12 were tragically killed as the result of a missile strike. Some photos of the young girls were on view together with an abundance of flowers and ‘cuddly’ toys. There was also a book of condolence which organisers stated would be sent to Iran in order that it could be viewed by bereaved parents.

Other than the exchange of insults referred to above the march and rally was generally peaceful; the Met later gave details of three arrests during this event.
Million Women Rise meet the pro-monarchists.

With International Woman’s Day on Sunday the 8th of March, a Million Women Rise march and rally took place in London during the previous day. It began in Duke Street by Selfridges and advance publicity made it clear that men were not welcome. The crowd marched to Trafalgar Square where an extremely effective sound system relayed speeches, chants and songs.
In Whitehall, a much smaller than usual rally of pro-Iranian monarchists took place followed by a march on the well-trodden route to the Iranian Embassy. Another small group of monarchists complete with tent opted to remain on the raised section of Trafalgar Square in front of the National Gallery. Only four local officers from nearby Charing Cross police station were assigned to keep an eye on proceedings. They probably wouldn’t have anticipated having to call for reinforcements or use tape to create a sterile area.
As I arrived from the US Embassy protest, I could see in the distance some urgent police activity on the raised section in front of the National Gallery. It would appear that as the women arrived in the Square, pro-Iranian monarchists and their supporters realised that a number of arriving women were pro-Palestine.
The pro-Palestinians also realised that the small group were displaying flags which showed they were pro-Monarchist, pro-Israel and pro-USA. This led to verbal exchanges which the four officers had to react to; hence the request for additional officers and the creation of a sterile area,
The women’s protest was full of both song and chanting and there was much criticism of predatory men and men in general.
Meanwhile, at the Iranian Embassy, there was just one arrest.
Iran Embassy celebrations, a stabbing and a future challenge.
On the Sunday, there was yet another Iranian monarchist march from Downing Street to the Embassy. I opted for three televised FA Cup matches but news reports stated that there was still a celebratory atmosphere outside the Embassy despite the apocalyptic scenes from Iranian cities appearing on news channels and the Tehran girl’s school tragedy referred to above.
The previous evening there was a reported stabbing of a pro-monarchist activist in Finchley with several arrests being made as Met response vehicles rushed to the area with officers rendering first aid to the victim.
The controversial Al-Quds march.

This Sunday, the controversial Al Quds march was due to take place but a request by the Met’s Commissioner that it be banned has been approved by the Home Secretary.
This decision has surprised most regular protest observers in that whilst disorder could have been anticipated, it is unlikely that it would have reached the previously perceived threshold of threat to life and/or severe damage to property. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that had the march taken place, given the complex situation that exists, tensions across the country would have been raised still further thus increasing the risk of mass disorder similar to that seen in the aftermath of the Southport tragedy.
In any event large numbers of officers will still have to be present in central London in case the ban is defied and mass arrests have to be made. Another possible scenario could involve a static protest which cannot be banned as such but could still have draconian conditions imposed. Finally, the organisers could, through the courts, attempt a legal challenge to the ban.
Update: The organisers have stated that they will be seeking legal advice and organising a static protest.
Stay up to date with all of our latest updates and content by following us on our social media accounts!
We have created community pages where we will share our up-to-date stories happening in the area. Add the area closest to where you live.
Discover more from The Havering Daily
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.













The Conservatives and Labour have turned Britain into a sharia-dominated Muslim country. After over 30 years of voting for the tories I will never vote for them again
I cannot blame you for never voting Tory again, but to claim that the UK is now a Muslim Sharia Law dominated country really is utter garbage of the highest order.
No, Tina, they haven’t.
Around 4% of the UK population identify as Muslim, which is as far from ‘domination’ as you can get.
As for ‘Sharia Law’: you do know, don’t you, that Sharia Law has the same status in law as Christian ecclesiastical courts and Jewish Beth Din courts i.e. they can be used by consenting parties as a kind of arbitration service, but have no standing as a legal body and their adjudications cannot supercede UK law. I’m sure you did know that.
Maybe try reining in the conspiracy theories and stop believing the nonsense that the likes of Reform and GB News propagate.
@simon under the Conservatives the UK’s Muslim population increased from just 2.4 million in 2011 to over 4 million in 2021, an estimated 85 sharia law courts operated across the uk under the conservatives due to the tories refusing to ban sharia law courts. They also refused to ban cousin marriages, the burka, the Muslim brotherhood, the Iranian revolutionary guards and pro-Palestine marches in the uk during their 14 years in power
Tina
I refer you to my previous comment of 4% hardly constituting ‘domination’ as well as that regarding the legal status of Sharia ‘courts’ in the UK (as well as Christian and Jewish religious ‘courts’).
The Muslim Brotherhood and IRGC can no more be banned in the UK than can ICE or Mossas: declared a ‘terrorist group’, yes, but banned, no.
Marriage between first cousins has always been legal in the UK – indeed, the royal family have long been proponents – so why is it only now an issue when a Muslim does so ?
If you banned the burqa, will you also ban the nun’s habit and the balaclava – or is it only Muslims who can’t cover their head ?
Did you call for the banning of the hotel protests or Yaxley-Lennon’s marches as well as the pro-Palestinian demos – or is it just Muslims you don’t want on the streets ?
Some may think you have an agenda…