Build Build Build-Community Anger Versus Housing Targets, What Next For Local Councils?

Across London and beyond, local councils are finding themselves squeezed between government housing demands and the realities of stretched infrastructure. Communities are left asking — where will the schools, GP surgeries, and transport links come from to match the surge in new homes?

Across Havering residents are reading about huge planning applications across the borough. Romford’s Bridge Close, Havering’s possible Wingletye Lane, Harold Hill redevelopments, the list goes on and on. Residents fear the over development of the borough.

The government has set ambitious housing targets, pushing for 300,000 new homes a year across England. London boroughs, guided by the Mayor’s London Plan, are allocated their own share of that total. For councils like Havering, this means constant pressure to earmark land for large-scale housing projects.

But the reality on the ground is far more complicated. Local authorities say they are being forced to identify land for housing, even when the surrounding infrastructure simply cannot cope. Roads already clogged with traffic, schools bursting at the seams, and GP surgeries with long waiting lists are just some of the problems residents raise time and again.

Councillors find themselves caught between two sides. On one hand, they face the government’s warning that if housing targets aren’t met, developers can appeal and potentially push through applications regardless of local objections. On the other, they face residents’ genuine fears that quality of life will decline as new estates rise without the services to support them.

In Havering, where green space has long been part of the borough’s character, the pressure is particularly keenly felt. Large swathes of land, once seen as untouchable, are being eyed for development. While councils acknowledge the need for new homes, especially affordable ones — they stress that building houses without matching investment in infrastructure is a recipe for long-term problems.

The debate is no longer about if homes will be built, but where and how. Should precious greenbelt be sacrificed? Should already strained town centres be asked to absorb more flats? And crucially, who will pay for the schools, GP practices, bus routes, and road upgrades needed to make these new communities work?

For residents, the sadness is that local voices can feel drowned out in the rush to hit targets. “We understand people need homes,” one Havering resident said, “but without proper infrastructure, it’s not fair on us or the people moving in.”

As councils struggle to balance government directives with the realities of local life, one thing is clear: bricks and mortar alone don’t make communities. Without the services that allow people to live well, housing targets risk becoming numbers on a page — achieved at the expense of the very communities they are meant to serve.

Stay up to date with all of our latest updates and content by following us on our social media accounts!

We have created community pages where we will share our up-to-date stories happening in the area. Add the area closest to where you live.