Havering’s Future: Stay with London or Join Greater Essex?
The Havering Daily looks at the Pros and Cons of both leaving or staying in London.
Havering, an East London borough with around 259,552 residents, is at the heart of a lively debate: should it stay with the Greater London Authority (GLA) or join a proposed “Greater Essex” region?
A Havering Daily poll on Facebook showed 68% of over 1,500 residents support leaving the GLA for Essex, dubbed “Hexit”. No decision is on the table, but voices like Romford MP Andrew Rosindell argue Havering is “stuck under City Hall”, paying heavily with little return.
To help you join the conversation, we’ve outlined the pros and cons, focusing on money, transport, healthcare, policing, education, housing, and local identity.
Why the Debate?
Havering, covering 43 square miles, was part of Essex until it joined Greater London in 1965. Many residents still feel Essex pride, with poll comments like, “We were Essex, we still feel like Essex”. Rosindell claims Havering’s £600 per household GLA precept subsidises inner London, leaving the borough short-changed.
This article explores both sides to inform your view.
Staying with the Greater London Authority
Pros of Staying with the GLA
Big Funding for Local Projects
The GLA provides grants like £1.6 million in February 2025 for Havering’s “A Good Life” Cultural Strategy, boosting arts and community events. This funding supports local growth and might be harder to replace in Greater Essex.
Affordable Transport to London
Havering has decent transport links via TfL, with five District Line stations (Elm Park, Hornchurch, Upminster, Upminster Bridge, Dagenham East), Elizabeth Line stations (Romford, Gidea Park, Harold Wood), and c2c rail at Rainham and Upminster. Pensioners get the Freedom Pass for free travel across London, despite Havering’s £8 million contribution. This helps the 30% of residents commuting to London for work (2021 census).
Access to Local and London Healthcare
Residents rely on Queen’s Hospital in Romford and King George Hospital in Ilford, with easy access to London’s specialist centres. The GLA’s integrated GP network ensures quick referrals, vital for Havering’s 259,552 residents.
Stable Local Services
Havering’s schools, nurseries, and social housing benefit from London’s systems. School admissions for 36,000 pupils are streamlined, and the GLA helps manage demand for 4,000 households on Havering’s social housing waiting list.
Cons of Staying with the GLA
Policies Not Suited to Havering
London-wide rules like ULEZ hit Havering’s car-reliant residents hard, as some areas lack nearby Tube or rail stations, making compliance costly.
Less Local Control
Decisions on housing and transport are often made by the Mayor of London, feeling distant from Havering’s suburban needs. Rosindell argues the £600 GLA precept gives little back.
Higher Living Costs
Housing in Havering is pricier than in much of Essex, making it harder for young families and first-time buyers.
Uneven Transport Coverage
While Havering has good radial links to London, northern areas lack Tube or rail stations, relying on buses, which can mean longer, costlier commutes.
Joining Greater Essex
Pros of Joining Greater Essex
Restoring Essex Identity
Havering’s Essex history, including the Royal Liberty of Havering, fuels local pride. The poll’s 68% support shows many want to reclaim this identity.
Lower Council Taxes
Some Essex areas have cheaper taxes. A Band D property in Havering pays £2,313.55 a year, while in Epping Forest, it’s £2,186.69—a saving of £126.86 annually, or £10.50 a month, enough for a small bill.
More Local Decision-Making
A Greater Essex authority, planned for May 2026, could give Havering more say over housing, education, and services, free from London’s rules.
Cheaper Housing Options
Homes in Essex, like Chelmsford or Colchester, are more affordable, offering bigger properties for less money.
Cons of Joining Greater Essex
Higher Travel Costs to London
Leaving the GLA would end TfL benefits, including the Freedom Pass. Commuters (30% of residents) would face train fares from Romford to Liverpool Street, costing £5-£10 per trip, potentially hundreds a year, hitting pensioners and low-income residents hard.
Potential Healthcare Challenges
Havering residents use Queen’s Hospital, but joining Greater Essex might align it with the Mid and South Essex ICS, requiring travel to Basildon Hospital (20 miles, 50-70 minutes by bus via A127, with stops in Upminster) or Broomfield Hospital in Chelmsford (30 miles, 60-80 minutes via A12). Essex’s less integrated transport could raise costs, and GP networks might face delays during transition.
Pressure on Essex Police
Essex Police’s £366 million 2025/26 budget serves 1.8 million people. Adding Havering’s 259,552 residents could strain resources, requiring new stations or officers, potentially raising taxes or cutting services, unlike the Met Police’s London-wide funding.
Disrupted Local Services
Essex’s systems for school admissions, nurseries, and social housing differ. Havering’s 36,000 pupils could face new criteria, causing delays. The 4,000 households on the social housing waiting list might see increased pressure under Essex’s less-funded system.
What Residents Are Saying
Our poll’s 68% support for Hexit shows strong Essex pride, with social media posts saying Havering “never made sense” in London and many using “Essex” in addresses. Rosindell highlights inadequate policing and high GLA costs. But some residents worry about losing TfL’s Freedom Pass or facing new fares, with one post warning it could hit commuters hard. Local issues like fly-tipping also fuel discontent, suggesting a desire for change.
What’s at Stake?
This is about exploring Havering’s future. Staying with the GLA ensures funding, affordable transport for the 30% working in London, and access to Queen’s Hospital. But the £600 GLA precept and ULEZ feel unfair to many. Joining Greater Essex could save £126.86 a year on council tax and boost Essex pride, but new travel costs, potential healthcare shifts, policing pressures, and service disruptions could hit hard. Your house stays put, but services like buses, GPs, and schools could change.
Stay up to date with all of our latest updates and content by following us on our social media accounts!
We have created community pages where we will share our up-to-date stories happening in the area. Add the area closest to where you live.
Discover more from The Havering Daily
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.













The fact Rosindell supports this means it is pretty much a bad idea. Aside from the Over 60s travel benefits, Havering gets subsidised transport, compare an annual season ticket from Harold Wood and Brentwood, only a few minutes apart, yet the tickets cost a lot more. People drive in from Essex to get that reduction in cost. Rosindell is just promoting this to fend off Reform, desperately trying to hang on to his seat. Perhaps if he got off his hobby horse and actually tried to improve matters for his constituents he might have more success. Oddly this was never raised when Johnson was London Mayor?