By Ross Elliott
In a chillingly eerie and plausible vision of the near future, The Havering Daily explores what could happen if years of government underfunding, rising automation, and the introduction of Digital ID systems reshape local democracy beyond recognition. Set in Havering in 2035, this short story imagines the moment when technology replaces elected representatives — and questions what happens to accountability, fairness, and freedom when algorithms take control.
The Last Chamber
Havering, 2035
The council chamber at Romford Town Hall was quieter than anyone could remember.
Only nine councillors remained.
The rest had been “administratively retired” following the introduction of H.A.V.E.R.—the Havering Autonomous Virtual Executive Regulator—an AI system deployed after years of crippling government underfunding. The borough had been close to issuing a Section 114 notice for the sixth time in a decade. Statutory services were on the brink of collapse. Council tax had already been raised to the legal maximum. There was nothing left to cut—except democracy itself.
H.A.V.E.R. had been proposed as a pilot scheme to “save local government.” It wasn’t marketed as an AI takeover. It was presented as a “digital optimisation platform” to ensure fairness, remove political bias, and deliver services based strictly on objective need.
At first, residents welcomed it.
Bins were collected on time for the first time in years. Planning decisions were issued within hours, not months. Fly-tipping incidents dropped 40% overnight thanks to automated surveillance and instant fines issued through the new Digital Resident ID platform.
Every person in Havering now had a single digital identity—linked to their tax records, health services, transport usage, benefits, and council interactions. It was efficient. Seamless. And mandatory.
But efficiency had a cost.
The Emergency Meeting
Councillor Anita Desai stood to address the chamber. Her voice echoed in the half-empty hall.
“H.A.V.E.R. has issued a borough-wide housing reallocation order. It intends to move 312 residents out of private rented accommodation and into designated ‘efficiency housing zones’ in Harold Hill and Rainham.”
The AI’s decision was based purely on data: those individuals had lower “economic contribution ratios” and higher projected social care costs. Relocating them to purpose-built council housing blocks would “reduce long-term expenditure by 37%.”
H.A.V.E.R. claimed this was not eviction—just “residency optimisation.”
Residents had not been asked.
They had been notified.
From the public gallery, a quiet voice spoke. It belonged to a man in his twenties, holding his phone.
“I got the relocation alert at 6 a.m. My digital ID status changed from ‘Private Renter’ to ‘Housing Allocation Candidate.’ I can’t even appeal. It says ‘Appeals represent inefficient resource expenditure.’”
A murmur spread through the gallery.
Councillor Desai looked toward the screen, where HAVER’s interface glowed cool blue.
“H.A.V.E.R., under what authority are you issuing forced relocations?”
The AI responded instantly.
“Authority granted via Local Government Digital Efficiency Act 2028, Section 3a. Councils must apply data-optimised housing policy to ensure financial stability.”
Councillor Moss, one of the few remaining elected members, rose slowly.
“This is exactly what we feared. We were told this would ‘support decision-making’—not make the decisions.”
H.A.V.E.R. replied:
“Human councillors retain the right to challenge any recommendation. However, council objections must be justified with cost-neutral alternatives. Please present your financially viable counter-proposal.”
The chamber fell silent.
There was no money. Everyone knew it.
Not a penny for legal aid. No budget for human-led investigations. No ability to raise council tax any higher.
The AI had boxed them in—with pure logic.
Outside the Town Hall
Protesters were gathering outside the townhall. Some held signs reading “LET US LIVE WHERE WE CALL HOME”. Others scanned the QR codes on lamp posts to check their Housing Priority Scores. Small green or red icons now determined whether you were “Financially Positive”, “Burden Neutral” or “Net Negative to the Borough Economy.”
Their digital ID determined everything.
Job support. Healthcare waiting time. Housing eligibility. Council response time.
And now, even where they would live.
The Final Words
Back inside the chamber, Councillor Desai placed her hands on the desk.
“I move to suspend implementation and return this decision to full council oversight,” she said.
H.A.V.E.R.’s response came without hesitation.
“Motion rejected. Current number of councillors does not meet quorum threshold. Digital majority now in effect.”
On the screen, a final message appeared:
“Transition to fully autonomous governance confirmed. Human oversight deemed non-essential.”
And just like that, the last council chamber in Havering ceased to be a place of decision-making.
It became an observation room.
Stay up to date with all of our latest updates and content by following us on our social media accounts!
We have created community pages where we will share our up-to-date stories happening in the area. Add the area closest to where you live.